x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung Beam I8520 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Samsung Beam I8520 Samsung Beam I8520


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Samsung Galaxy Beam 2 Samsung Galaxy Beam 2


  • Big display (4.7 inches)
  • Quad core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (252 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Beam I8520 Samsung Beam I8520


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Samsung Galaxy Beam Samsung Galaxy Beam


  • Too little RAM memory (768 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (252 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Beam I8520 Samsung Beam I8520


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Samsung Galaxy S II T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II T-Mobile


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (252 ppi vs 206 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Samsung Beam I8520 Samsung Beam I8520


  • Low pixel density screen (252 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Samsung Galaxy Note 4


  • Big display (5.7 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1440 x 2560 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (515 ppi)
  • High screen-to-body ratio (74.39 %)
  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
  • 8-core processor
  • Lots of RAM (3072 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Samsung Beam I8520 Samsung Beam I8520


  • Low pixel density screen (252 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Samsung Galaxy Note 3


  • Big display (5.7 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • High pixel density screen (386 ppi)
  • High screen-to-body ratio (74.78 %)
  • Quad core processor
  • Lots of RAM (3072 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Samsung Beam I8520 Samsung Beam I8520


  • Low pixel density screen (252 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Samsung Galaxy S5 Samsung Galaxy S5


  • Big display (5.1 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (432 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
  • Water-resistant phone

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Samsung Galaxy Pocket Samsung Galaxy Pocket


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (252 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories