Samsung B5722 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Samsung B5722 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Samsung B5722 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Samsung B5722 vs Samsung B7722
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 146 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung B5722-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung B5722 vs Samsung Star II DUOS
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 146 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung B5722 vs Nokia C2-03
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia C2-03-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (32 MB RAM)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung B5722 vs Samsung C6112
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung B5722 vs Samsung Galaxy Y DUOS
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 127 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung B5722-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung B5722 vs Samsung C3332
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung B5722-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung B5722 vs Samsung C5212
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 128 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung B5722 vs Samsung C3752
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment




