BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230 vs. BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220
BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230 vs. BlackBerry Style 9670
BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
BlackBerry Style 9670
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches vs 0.73 inches inches)
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230 vs. BlackBerry Curve 8330
BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 32 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230 vs. Nokia 7205 Intrigue
BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
Nokia 7205 Intrigue
- Small dimensions (3.56 x 1.85 x 0.55 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230 vs. BlackBerry Curve 8530
BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230 vs. BlackBerry Pearl 8130
BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
BlackBerry Pearl 8130
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 260 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 32 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230 vs. BlackBerry Curve 8320
BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
BlackBerry Curve 8320
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
