RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 vs RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230-specific Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 vs RIM BlackBerry Style 9670
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches vs 0.73 inches)
RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
RIM BlackBerry Style 9670-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 vs RIM BlackBerry Kickstart 8210
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches vs 0.68 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
RIM BlackBerry Kickstart 8210-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 vs RIM BlackBerry Pearl 8120
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 260 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches)
RIM BlackBerry Pearl 8120-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (32 MB RAM)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 vs Samsung SGH-T139
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches vs 0.72 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Samsung SGH-T139-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 vs Samsung C3560
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches vs 0.65 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
Samsung C3560-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 vs RIM BlackBerry Curve 8900
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
RIM BlackBerry Curve 8900-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 vs RIM BlackBerry Curve 8520
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 152 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
RIM BlackBerry Curve 8520-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (512 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
