BlackBerry Pearl 3G Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
BlackBerry Pearl 3G vs. BlackBerry Pearl 9105
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.97 x 0.52 inches inches)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
BlackBerry Pearl 3G vs. BlackBerry Curve 9320
BlackBerry Pearl 3G
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.97 x 0.52 inches inches)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
BlackBerry Pearl 3G vs. BlackBerry Curve 9360
BlackBerry Curve 9360
- NFC
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.97 x 0.52 inches inches vs 4.29 x 2.36 x 0.43 inches inches)
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
BlackBerry Pearl 3G vs. BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220
BlackBerry Pearl 3G
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.97 x 0.52 inches inches)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
BlackBerry Pearl 3G vs. BlackBerry Curve 8520
BlackBerry Curve 8520
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (512 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (152 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
BlackBerry Pearl 3G vs. BlackBerry Style 9670
BlackBerry Pearl 3G
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.97 x 0.52 inches inches)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
BlackBerry Style 9670
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
BlackBerry Pearl 3G vs. BlackBerry Bold 9700
BlackBerry Pearl 3G
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.97 x 0.52 inches inches)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
