RIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to RIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how RIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
RIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G vs RIM BlackBerry Pearl 9105
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.97 x 0.52 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
RIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G-specific Pros & Cons
none
RIM BlackBerry Pearl 9105-specific Pros & Cons
none
RIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G vs RIM BlackBerry Curve 3G
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
RIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.97 x 0.52 inches)
RIM BlackBerry Curve 3G-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
RIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G vs RIM BlackBerry Curve 9360
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.97 x 0.52 inches vs 4.29 x 2.36 x 0.43 inches)
RIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G-specific Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
RIM BlackBerry Curve 9360-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
RIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G vs RIM BlackBerry Bold 9700
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
RIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.97 x 0.52 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
RIM BlackBerry Bold 9700-specific Pros & Cons
none
RIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G vs RIM BlackBerry Style 9670
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneRIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.97 x 0.52 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
RIM BlackBerry Style 9670-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
RIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G vs RIM BlackBerry Curve 8520
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
RIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.97 x 0.52 inches)
RIM BlackBerry Curve 8520-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (152 ppi)
- Slow processor (512 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
RIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G vs Nokia E6
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.97 x 0.52 inches vs 4.55 x 2.32 x 0.41 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
RIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
Nokia E6-specific Pros & Cons
- Global phone that can work on any GSM/UMTS network in the world
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (325 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Slow processor (680 MHz)
- The camera lacks autofocus
RIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G vs HP iPAQ Voice Messenger
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
RIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.97 x 0.52 inches)
HP iPAQ Voice Messenger-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
