Philips Xenium X810 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Philips Xenium X810 vs. Philips Xenium 9@9q
Philips Xenium X810
- Small dimensions (4.07 x 1.66 x 0.53 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Philips Xenium 9@9q
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.72 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X810 vs. Philips Xenium X713
Philips Xenium X810
- Small dimensions (4.07 x 1.66 x 0.53 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 146 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X810 vs. Philips Xenium X325
Philips Xenium X810
- Small dimensions (4.07 x 1.66 x 0.53 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X810 vs. Philips Xenium 9@9u
Philips Xenium X810
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.07 x 1.66 x 0.53 inches inches vs 4.21 x 1.76 x 0.58 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X810 vs. Philips X518
Philips Xenium X810
- Small dimensions (4.07 x 1.66 x 0.53 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X810 vs. Philips Xenium X710
Philips Xenium X810
- Small dimensions (4.07 x 1.66 x 0.53 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Philips Xenium X710
- Dual SIM card support
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X810 vs. Philips W725
Philips Xenium X810
- Small dimensions (4.07 x 1.66 x 0.53 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 146 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
-
1.
Samsung officials confirm 5.9-inch Note III will come at IFA in September, Galaxy S4 to hit 10 million sales next week
-
2.
What happens when the HTC One is overclocked to 2.0GHz?
-
3.
Rumored specs for the "rugged" Samsung Galaxy S4 reveal a different processor under the hood
-
4.
Alleged Samsung Galaxy S4 Active photos show rugged yet slim chassis
