Philips Xenium X806 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Philips Xenium X806 vs. Philips W920
Philips Xenium X806
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Philips W920
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X806 vs. Philips Xenium X710
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X806 vs. Philips Xenium X523
Philips Xenium X806
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS vs EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X806 vs. Philips Xenium X525
Philips Xenium X806
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS vs EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X806 vs. Philips Xenium X513
Philips Xenium X806
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X806 vs. Philips Xenium X216
Philips Xenium X806
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 114 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X806 vs. Philips Xenium X510
Philips Xenium X806
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
