Philips Xenium X800 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Philips Xenium X800 vs. Alcatel OT-708a
Philips Xenium X800
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X800 vs. Philips Xenium 9@9q
Philips Xenium X800
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an e-mail client
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches vs 0.72 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X800 vs. Philips 198
Philips Xenium X800
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
Philips 198
- Small dimensions (3.92 x 1.65 x 0.53 inches inches)
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X800 vs. Nokia 5530 XpressMusic
Philips Xenium X800
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia 5530 XpressMusic
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (253 ppi)
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.51 inches inches)
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
-
1.
Samsung officials confirm 5.9-inch Note III will come at IFA in September, Galaxy S4 to hit 10 million sales next week
-
2.
What happens when the HTC One is overclocked to 2.0GHz?
-
3.
Rumored specs for the "rugged" Samsung Galaxy S4 reveal a different processor under the hood
-
4.
Alleged Samsung Galaxy S4 Active photos show rugged yet slim chassis
