Philips Xenium X525 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Philips Xenium X525 vs. HTC Flyer CDMA
Philips Xenium X525
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 170 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X525 vs. Philips Xenium X713
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 146 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X525 vs. Philips Xenium X806
Philips Xenium X806
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X525 vs. Philips Xenium X513
Philips Xenium X525
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X525 vs. Philips W725
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 146 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X525 vs. Philips X518
Philips X518
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X525 vs. Philips Xenium X710
Philips Xenium X710
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
