x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Philips Xenium X525 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Philips Xenium X525 Philips Xenium X525


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

HTC Flyer CDMA HTC Flyer CDMA


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X525 Philips Xenium X525


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Philips Xenium X513 Philips Xenium X513


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi vs 182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X525 Philips Xenium X525


  • The camera lacks autofocus

Philips Xenium X713 Philips Xenium X713


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi vs 146 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X525 Philips Xenium X525


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Huawei IDEOS X5 Huawei IDEOS X5


  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi vs 246 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X525 Philips Xenium X525


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi

Nokia Asha 501 Nokia Asha 501


  • Small dimensions (3.91 x 2.28 x 0.48 inches)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi vs 133 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X525 Philips Xenium X525


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Samsung Galaxy Note 3


  • Big display (5.7 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen (386 ppi)
  • High screen-to-body ratio (74.78 %)
  • Quad core processor
  • Lots of RAM (3072 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X525 Philips Xenium X525


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia 500 Nokia 500


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (155 ppi vs 229 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 360 x 640 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories