x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Philips Xenium X325 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Philips Xenium X325 Philips Xenium X325


  • The camera lacks autofocus

Philips Xenium X710 Philips Xenium X710


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X325 Philips Xenium X325


  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X325 Philips Xenium X325


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Philips Xenium X216 Philips Xenium X216


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 114 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X325 Philips Xenium X325


  • Low-resolution video capture

Micromax X230 Micromax X230


  • Splash-proof phone
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 114 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 144 x 176 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X325 Philips Xenium X325


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Sony Xperia SP Sony Xperia SP


  • Big display (4.6 inches)
  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen, over 300ppi (319 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
  • Dual core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • NFC
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X325 Philips Xenium X325


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia X1-01 Nokia X1-01


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 114 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X325 Philips Xenium X325


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

LG CF360 LG CF360


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories