x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Philips Xenium X216 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Philips Xenium X216 Philips Xenium X216


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Philips Xenium X710 Philips Xenium X710


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X216 Philips Xenium X216


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Philips X526 Philips X526


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X216 Philips Xenium X216


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Philips Xenium X325 Philips Xenium X325


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X216 Philips Xenium X216


  • Dual SIM card support
  • No rear camera
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Nokia Asha 201 Nokia Asha 201


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X216 Philips Xenium X216


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Samsung C3322 Samsung C3322


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X216 Philips Xenium X216


  • Dual SIM card support
  • No rear camera
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Nokia 301 Nokia 301


  • Small dimensions (4.49 x 1.97 x 0.49 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X216 Philips Xenium X216


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)

Motorola V195 / V197 Motorola V195 / V197


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.94 inches inches)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • No rear camera
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories