Philips Xenium X216 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Philips Xenium X216 vs. Samsung E1150
Philips Xenium X216
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
Samsung E1150
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No rear camera
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X216 vs. Samsung E1195
Philips Xenium X216
- Dual SIM card support
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
Samsung E1195
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- No rear camera
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X216 vs. Verykool i605
Philips Xenium X216
- Dual SIM card support
- No rear camera
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X216 vs. Emporia CONNECT
Emporia CONNECT
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X216 vs. Nokia Asha 201
Philips Xenium X216
- Dual SIM card support
- No rear camera
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks an e-mail client
Nokia Asha 201
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X216 vs. Philips Xenium X806
Philips Xenium X806
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips Xenium X216 vs. Philips Xenium X523
Philips Xenium X523
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
