x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Philips Xenium X216 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Philips Xenium X216 Philips Xenium X216


  • No rear camera

Philips Xenium X710 Philips Xenium X710


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X216 Philips Xenium X216


  • Dual SIM card support
  • No rear camera
  • Lacks Wi-Fi

Philips W920 Philips W920


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 217 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X216 Philips Xenium X216


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)

Philips Xenium 9@9h Philips Xenium 9@9h


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • No rear camera
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X216 Philips Xenium X216


  • Dual SIM card support
  • No rear camera

Emporia CONNECT Emporia CONNECT


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE, GPRS)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X216 Philips Xenium X216


  • Dual SIM card support
  • No rear camera

Nokia 6600 fold Nokia 6600 fold


  • Small dimensions (3.45 x 1.73 x 0.62 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 188 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X216 Philips Xenium X216


  • Dual SIM card support

Nokia 130 Nokia 130


  • Small dimensions (4.17 x 1.79 x 0.55 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • No rear camera
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Philips Xenium X216 Philips Xenium X216


  • No rear camera

Philips Xenium X523 Philips Xenium X523


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories