Philips X526 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Philips X526 vs. Philips Xenium X713
Philips X526
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 146 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips X526 vs. Motorola GLEAM+
Philips X526
- Dual SIM card support
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips X526 vs. Nokia Asha 202
Philips X526
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia Asha 202
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips X526 vs. Nokia C2-06
Nokia C2-06
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches vs 0.67 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips X526 vs. Philips Xenium X216
Philips X526
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 114 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips X526 vs. Philips Xenium X523
Philips X526
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Philips X526 vs. Nokia 101
Philips X526
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
