Pantech Matrix Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Pantech Matrix vs. Pantech Laser
Pantech Laser
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi)
- Small dimensions (4.45 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Pantech Matrix vs. Pantech Matrix Pro
Pantech Matrix Pro
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches vs 0.85 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Pantech Matrix vs. Pantech Renue
Pantech Matrix
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Pantech Renue
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (125 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Pantech Matrix vs. Pantech Duo
Pantech Duo
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS, HSDPA 1.8 Mbit/s)
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- Slow processor (416 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Pantech Matrix vs. LG Thrill 4G
Pantech Matrix
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG Thrill 4G
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- Dual core processor
- Dual-lens camera for capturing 3D content
- 3D display for viewing 3D content without glasses
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
- Low pixel density screen (217 ppi)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Pantech Matrix vs. Samsung Evergreen
Samsung Evergreen
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Pantech Matrix vs. HTC Windows Phone 8X
Pantech Matrix
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HTC Windows Phone 8X
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (342 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Dual core processor
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
More Rivals
