Palm Treo 700w / 700wx Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Palm Treo 700w / 700wx vs. Palm Treo Pro CDMA
Palm Treo 700w / 700wx
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 240 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (32 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Palm Treo 700w / 700wx vs. Samsung Galaxy S III
Palm Treo 700w / 700wx
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 240 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (32 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Samsung Galaxy S III
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (4.8 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (306 ppi)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Palm Treo 700w / 700wx vs. Palm Treo Pro
Palm Treo 700w / 700wx
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 240 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (312 MHz vs 400 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (32 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Palm Treo 700w / 700wx vs. Nokia Lumia 920
Palm Treo 700w / 700wx
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 240 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (32 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Nokia Lumia 920
- Dual core processor
- Big display (4.5 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (332 ppi)
- High-resolution display (768 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8.7 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Palm Treo 700w / 700wx vs. Samsung GALAXY Note II
Palm Treo 700w / 700wx
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 240 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (32 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Samsung GALAXY Note II
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (5.5 inches)
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (265 ppi)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1600 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
- Supports special active stylus for input
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Palm Treo 700w / 700wx vs. Apple iPhone 5
Palm Treo 700w / 700wx
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 240 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (32 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Apple iPhone 5
- Dual core processor
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
- High-resolution display (640 x 1136 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1300 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1016 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Small dimensions (4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Palm Treo 700w / 700wx vs. Palm Treo 800w
Palm Treo 700w / 700wx
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 240 pixels)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches vs 0.73 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (32 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison

