Palm Treo 680 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Palm Treo 680 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Palm Treo 680 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Palm Treo 680 vs HP Pre3
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Bulky
Palm Treo 680-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
HP Pre3-specific Pros & Cons
- Dual-mode CDMA/GSM phone
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (261 ppi)
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Palm Treo 680 vs Palm Pixi Plus GSM
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Palm Treo 680-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Palm Pixi Plus GSM-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.37 x 2.17 x 0.43 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Palm Treo 680 vs Palm Treo 750 / 750v
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (312 MHz vs 300 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS, HSDPA 1.8 Mbit/s)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches vs 0.86 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Palm Treo 680-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
Palm Treo 750 / 750v-specific Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 240 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Palm Treo 680 vs Palm Pre 2 GSM
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches vs 0.67 inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Palm Treo 680-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Palm Pre 2 GSM-specific Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Palm Treo 680 vs RIM BlackBerry Bold 9780 T-Mobile
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonePalm Treo 680-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
RIM BlackBerry Bold 9780 T-Mobile-specific Pros & Cons
none
Palm Treo 680 vs Palm Centro
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches vs 0.73 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Palm Treo 680-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
Palm Centro-specific Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Palm Treo 680 vs RIM BlackBerry Bold 9900
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks autofocus
Palm Treo 680-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
RIM BlackBerry Bold 9900-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi)
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (768 MB RAM)
Palm Treo 680 vs RIM BlackBerry Curve 9360
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs UMTS, EDGE)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
Palm Treo 680-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
RIM BlackBerry Curve 9360-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 2.36 x 0.43 inches)
