Palm Treo 650 (CDMA) Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Palm Treo 650 (CDMA) vs. Palm Treo 755p
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches vs 0.84 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Palm Treo 650 (CDMA) vs. Palm Treo 700p
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Palm Treo 650 (CDMA) vs. Palm Treo 800w
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches vs 0.73 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Palm Treo 650 (CDMA) vs. Motorola Q CDMA
Palm Treo 650 (CDMA)
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Palm Treo 650 (CDMA) vs. BlackBerry Curve 8330
Palm Treo 650 (CDMA)
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Palm Treo 650 (CDMA) vs. Motorola DROID 4
Palm Treo 650 (CDMA)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Motorola DROID 4
- Dual core processor
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (275 ppi)
- High-resolution display (540 x 960 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
- Splash-proof phone
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Palm Treo 650 (CDMA) vs. Apple iPhone 5
Palm Treo 650 (CDMA)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (312 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Apple iPhone 5
- Dual core processor
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
- High-resolution display (640 x 1136 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1300 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1016 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Small dimensions (4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
More Rivals
