x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Palm Pre Palm Pre


none

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Palm Pre Palm Pre


none

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Palm Pre Palm Pre


  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

Google Nexus 5 Google Nexus 5


  • Big display (5.0 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (445 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

in-depth comparison



Palm Pre Palm Pre


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)

Palm Pixi Plus Palm Pixi Plus


  • Small dimensions (4.37 x 2.17 x 0.43 inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi vs 195 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 320 x 400 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Palm Pre Palm Pre


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

HP Pre3 HP Pre3


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi vs 261 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Palm Pre Palm Pre


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

HTC TyTN II HTC TyTN II


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches vs 0.74 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Palm Pre Palm Pre


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)

HP Veer 4G HP Veer 4G


  • Small dimensions (3.31 x 2.15 x 0.59 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (186 ppi vs 197 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 320 x 400 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories