PCD Shuttle Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to PCD Shuttle the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how PCD Shuttle compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
PCD Shuttle vs Kyocera G2GO M2000
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
PCD Shuttle vs Pantech PN-810
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches vs 0.86 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
PCD Shuttle vs Samsung Slash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi vs 108 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches vs 0.66 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
PCD Shuttle vs PCD PCS-1450
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi vs 114 ppi)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment