x We have placed cookies on your device to make your experience better. Find more info here.

Orange San Francisco II Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Orange San Francisco II Orange San Francisco II


  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

LG Renoir US LG Renoir US


  • Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Orange San Francisco II Orange San Francisco II


  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

Nokia C7 Nokia C7


  • Small dimensions (4.62 x 2.24 x 0.41 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi vs 210 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels vs 360 x 640 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Orange San Francisco II Orange San Francisco II


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)

ZTE San Francisco ZTE San Francisco


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Orange San Francisco II Orange San Francisco II


  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)

ZTE Blade ZTE Blade


  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Orange San Francisco II Orange San Francisco II


  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)

Motorola Moto G Motorola Moto G


  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel density screen (329 ppi)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Orange San Francisco II Orange San Francisco II


  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

Motorola Moto X Play Motorola Moto X Play


  • Big display (5.5 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • High pixel density screen (403 ppi)
  • High screen-to-body ratio (74.72 %)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Splash-proof phone

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories