Nokia X3 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia X3 vs. Nokia X3 Touch and Type
Nokia X3 Touch and Type
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.78 x 1.94 x 0.56 inches inches vs 4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia X3 vs. Nokia Asha 311
Nokia X3
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia Asha 311
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.78 x 1.94 x 0.56 inches inches vs 4.17 x 2.05 x 0.51 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia X3 vs. Samsung Galaxy S III
Nokia X3
- Small dimensions (3.78 x 1.94 x 0.56 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Galaxy S III
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (4.8 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (306 ppi)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Nokia X3 vs. Nokia X2-02
Nokia X3
- Small dimensions (3.78 x 1.94 x 0.56 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an e-mail client
Nokia X2-02
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia X3 vs. Nokia C3
Nokia C3
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia X3 vs. Nokia X2
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.78 x 1.94 x 0.56 inches inches vs 4.37 x 1.85 x 0.52 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia X3 vs. Nokia C2-02
Nokia X3
- Small dimensions (3.78 x 1.94 x 0.56 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an e-mail client
Nokia C2-02
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
