Nokia X3 Touch and Type Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia X3 Touch and Type vs. Nokia Asha 300
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches inches vs 4.44 x 1.95 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia X3 Touch and Type vs. Nokia C3 Touch and Type
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches inches vs 4.37 x 1.87 x 0.43 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
Nokia X3 Touch and Type vs. Nokia Asha 303
Nokia X3 Touch and Type
- Small dimensions (4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
Nokia X3 Touch and Type vs. Nokia C5 5MP
Nokia X3 Touch and Type
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches inches vs 4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia X3 Touch and Type vs. Nokia Asha 311
Nokia X3 Touch and Type
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches inches vs 4.17 x 2.05 x 0.51 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia X3 Touch and Type vs. Nokia X2-02
Nokia X3 Touch and Type
- Small dimensions (4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia X3 Touch and Type vs. Nokia Asha 302
Nokia X3 Touch and Type
- Small dimensions (4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison

