Nokia X2-05 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia X2-05 vs. Nokia X2-02
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia X2-05 vs. Nokia X2
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia X2-05 vs. Nokia X1-01
Nokia X2-05
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 114 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia X2-05 vs. Nokia C2-03
Nokia C2-03
- Dual SIM card support
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia X2-05 vs. Samsung C3322
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia X2-05 vs. Nokia Asha 200
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia X2-05 vs. Nokia X3 Touch and Type
Nokia X3 Touch and Type
- Small dimensions (4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
