Nokia N96 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Nokia N96 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Nokia N96 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia N96 vs Nokia N86 8MP
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- Slow processor (264 MHz vs 434 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches vs 0.65 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 75 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia N96-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N86 8MP-specific Pros & Cons
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
Nokia N96 vs Nokia N85
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- Slow processor (264 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia N96-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N85-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia N96 vs Nokia N95 8GB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (264 MHz vs 332 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches vs 0.82 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N96-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia N95 8GB-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Nokia N96 vs Nokia X3 Touch and Type
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N96-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (264 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
Nokia X3 Touch and Type-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Nokia N96 vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneNokia N96-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (264 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Galaxy S II-specific Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Thin body, measuring less than 9.5mm/0.37inches (0.33 inches)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Small dimensions (4.93 x 2.60 x 0.33 inches)
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Nokia N96 vs Nokia N82
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Slow processor (264 MHz vs 332 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches vs 0.68 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N96-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
Nokia N82-specific Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
Nokia N96 vs Nokia N95 8GB US
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (264 MHz vs 332 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches vs 0.82 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N96-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia N95 8GB US-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Nokia N96 vs Nokia 5800 XpressMusic
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (264 MHz vs 434 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N96-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
Nokia 5800 XpressMusic-specific Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
