Nokia N96 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia N96 vs. Nokia N95 8GB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (264 MHz vs 332 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches vs 0.82 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia N96 vs. Nokia N86 8MP
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (264 MHz vs 434 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches vs 0.65 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 75 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia N96 vs. Nokia N95
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (264 MHz vs 332 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches vs 0.82 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia N96 vs. Nokia N85
Nokia N96
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (264 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia N96 vs. Nokia N97
Nokia N96
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
Nokia N97
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (264 MHz vs 434 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia N96 vs. Nokia 6700 slide
Nokia N96
- Slow processor (264 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6700 slide
- Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia N96 vs. Nokia N82
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (264 MHz vs 332 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches vs 0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
