Nokia N96 US Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia N96 US vs. Nokia N96
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (264 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia N96 US vs. Nokia N86 8MP
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- Slow processor (264 MHz vs 434 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 75 MB RAM)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches vs 0.65 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia N96 US vs. Nokia N8
Nokia N96 US
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N8
- High-resolution camera (12.1 megapixels)
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Mini HDMI (Type C))
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 210 ppi)
- Slow processor (264 MHz vs 680 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
in-depth comparison
Nokia N96 US vs. Nokia N85
Nokia N96 US
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- Slow processor (264 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia N96 US vs. Nokia N95 8GB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (264 MHz vs 332 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches vs 0.82 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia N96 US vs. Nokia 6600
Nokia N96 US
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (264 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia 6600
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches vs 0.93 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 208 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia N96 US vs. Nokia E72 US
Nokia N96 US
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Slow processor (264 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
