Nokia N95 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia N95 vs. Nokia N95 8GB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia N95 vs. Nokia N96
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz vs 264 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches inches vs 0.70 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia N95 vs. Nokia N82
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches inches vs 0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia N95 vs. Nokia N73
Nokia N95
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
Nokia N73
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches inches vs 0.74 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia N95 vs. Nokia N8
Nokia N95
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N8
- High-resolution camera (12.1 megapixels)
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Mini HDMI (Type C))
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz vs 680 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
in-depth comparison
Nokia N95 vs. Nokia N85
Nokia N95
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches inches)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia N95 vs. Nokia N80
Nokia N95
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia N80
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches inches vs 0.92 inches inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
