Nokia N92 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia N92 vs. Nokia N93i
Nokia N93i
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs UMTS, EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.97 inches inches vs 0.98 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia N92 vs. Nokia N90
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.97 inches inches vs 0.96 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia N92 vs. Nokia N93
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs UMTS, EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.97 inches inches vs 1.11 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia N92 vs. Nokia Lumia 920
Nokia N92
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.97 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia Lumia 920
- Dual core processor
- Big display (4.5 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (332 ppi)
- High-resolution display (768 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8.7 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
in-depth comparison
Nokia N92 vs. Nokia Lumia 900
Nokia N92
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.97 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia Lumia 900
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
in-depth comparison
Nokia N92 vs. Nokia N96
Nokia N92
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia N96
- Slow processor (264 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.97 inches inches vs 0.70 inches inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia N92 vs. Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7
Nokia N92
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.97 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7
- Dual core processor
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
