Nokia N900 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia N900 vs. Nokia N9
Nokia N900
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia N9
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- NFC
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi vs 251 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Nokia N900 vs. Nokia Lumia 900
Nokia N900
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia Lumia 900
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Nokia N900 vs. Nokia N8
Nokia N900
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia N8
- High-resolution camera (12.1 megapixels)
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Mini HDMI (Type C))
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz vs 680 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
in-depth comparison
Nokia N900 vs. Nokia E7
Nokia N900
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E7
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Mini HDMI (Type C))
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz vs 680 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
in-depth comparison
Nokia N900 vs. Nokia N97
Nokia N900
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz vs 434 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia N900 vs. Nokia N97 mini
Nokia N900
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz vs 434 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia N900 vs. Nokia Lumia 920
Nokia N900
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia Lumia 920
- Dual core processor
- Big display (4.5 inches)
- High-resolution display (768 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8.7 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi vs 332 ppi)
in-depth comparison
