Nokia N86 8MP US Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia N86 8MP US vs. Nokia Lumia 900
Nokia N86 8MP US
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (75 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia Lumia 900
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
in-depth comparison
Nokia N86 8MP US vs. Nokia N9
Nokia N86 8MP US
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (75 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia N9
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (251 ppi)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- NFC
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
in-depth comparison
Nokia N86 8MP US vs. Nokia N82
Nokia N82
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (434 MHz vs 332 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches vs 0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (75 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia N86 8MP US vs. Nokia N85
Nokia N86 8MP US
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
- Too little RAM memory (75 MB RAM)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (434 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia N86 8MP US vs. Nokia N86 8MP
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (75 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia N86 8MP US vs. Nokia N8
Nokia N86 8MP US
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia N8
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Mini HDMI (Type C))
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels vs 12.1 megapixels)
- Slow processor (434 MHz vs 680 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (75 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
in-depth comparison
Nokia N86 8MP US vs. LG Optimus 4X HD
Nokia N86 8MP US
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (75 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
LG Optimus 4X HD
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (4.7 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (312 ppi)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
in-depth comparison
