Nokia N82 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia N82 vs. Nokia N79
Nokia N82
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia N82 vs. Nokia N73
Nokia N82
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
Nokia N73
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches vs 0.74 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia N82 vs. Nokia N95
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches vs 0.82 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia N82 vs. Nokia N78
Nokia N82
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 96 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia N82 vs. Nokia N85
Nokia N82
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia N82 vs. Nokia N86 8MP
Nokia N82
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz vs 434 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches vs 0.65 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 75 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia N82 vs. Nokia C5 5MP
Nokia N82
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
Nokia C5 5MP
- Small dimensions (4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- The camera lacks autofocus
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
