Nokia N81 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia N81 vs. Nokia N82
Nokia N81
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 332 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches vs 0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia N81 vs. Nokia E51
Nokia N81
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
Nokia E51
- Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches inches)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia N81 vs. Nokia N73
Nokia N81
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia N73
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs UMTS, EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches vs 0.74 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia N81 vs. Nokia 6210 Navigator
Nokia N81
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia N81 vs. Nokia N80
Nokia N81
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia N80
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs UMTS, EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches vs 0.92 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia N81 vs. Nokia 6220 classic
Nokia N81
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia 6220 classic
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 182 ppi)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia N81 vs. Sony Xperia tipo
Nokia N81
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 180 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
