Nokia N75 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Nokia N75 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Nokia N75 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia N75 vs Samsung Sync
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS, HSDPA 1.8 Mbit/s)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches vs 0.69 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N75-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Bulky
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung Sync-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia N75 vs Motorola RAZR2 V9x
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N75-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Motorola RAZR2 V9x-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.05 x 2.08 x 0.52 inches)
Nokia N75 vs Samsung SGH-G400
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N75-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung SGH-G400-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia N75 vs Nokia 6126 / 6133b
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches vs 0.78 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N75-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Bulky
Nokia 6126 / 6133b-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia N75 vs Nokia 6288
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches vs 0.82 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N75-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Bulky
Nokia 6288-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Nokia N75 vs Nokia 7373
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches vs 0.90 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N75-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Bulky
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
Nokia 7373-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia N75 vs Samsung Star WiFi
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N75-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung Star WiFi-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia N75 vs Nokia N97
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N75-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Nokia N97-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
