Nokia N-Gage Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia N-Gage vs. Nokia N-Gage QD
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No rear camera
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches inches vs 0.87 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia N-Gage vs. Nokia N70
Nokia N70
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches inches vs 0.89 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia N-Gage vs. Nokia N72
Nokia N72
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches inches vs 0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia N-Gage vs. Nokia 6630
Nokia 6630
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches inches vs 0.81 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia N-Gage vs. Nokia 3300
Nokia N-Gage
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches inches vs 0.78 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia N-Gage vs. Samsung Champ
Nokia N-Gage
- No rear camera
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung Champ
- Small dimensions (3.79 x 2.12 x 0.51 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an e-mail client
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia N-Gage vs. Nokia N79
Nokia N-Gage
- No rear camera
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
in-depth comparison
