x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Nokia N-Gage QD User Reviews

Post new review

Please note that each user review reflects the opinion of its respectful author and not of Phone Arena.

gian
posted on 19 Nov 2007, 20:01

8.2

n-gage

i'm really happy when i had my nokia n-gage. u can install 3rd party application such as mp3's and a lot of games. but i think it would be better if it has built in camera (megapixel ofcourse!) and fm radio. more access for costomization ie; themes, icons, and skin. added versatility in terms of data communication ei; usb port and infrared. but over all....it' good.but i'm still looking forward bout it's improvements someday.

Design 10/10
Features 7/10
Sound Quality 7/10
Signal Strength 9/10
Value for money 8/10

0 out of 1 people found this review helpful. Do you?

Report

deadlylfower22
posted on 19 May 2005, 04:06

6.2

is this supposed to be the upgraded version?

nokia n-gage was a great idea, but the first product wasn't that good even with the cool features,when QD was released i was expecting a lot, but what happened? where did the MP3 go? and how come there still no camera? come on guys...make the perfect n-gage!!!!

Design 7/10
Features 6/10
Sound Quality 6/10
Signal Strength 6/10
Value for money 6/10

1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. Do you?

Report

Borjan
posted on 01 Jan 2005, 09:43

7.8

ah...

i think that this phone is great. Eventhough the first version of n-gage had MP3 , this version i mean the QD
hasnt got any MP3 . But thats not a big problem because you can play the songs by the windows media player. The 3D - graphics are great. Anyway I am from Macedonia ( southern europe ) and thats why i bought
n-gage qd for 250 euros. Thats expensive. I ve heard that i can buy it from the net for 150 euros but the transport is minimum 50 euros. i forgot to say ...
HAPPY NEW YEAR AND HAPPY HOLLIDAYS !!
thanx

BORJAN

Design 10/10
Features 8/10
Sound Quality 6/10
Signal Strength 5/10
Value for money 10/10

1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. Do you?

Report

Werre
posted on 08 Dec 2004, 01:59

6.2

Superior to the original, but at a cost

Compared to the original it looks better, is smaller, more ergonomic and can actually be used as a (lame) mobile phone.

But it no longer can play mp3 ring tones, and the lack of USB is usability-wise a letdown since most laptop bluetooth software is terrible and everything you upload to it must be xferred via Inbox.

I really hate the originals design flaws. This is much better, but still a compromise. But, at 149 euros it's the cheapest Symbian phone and for emulators, surfing and stuff it beats non-symbian phones 100-0. Easy programmability is a huge plus and I heard someone's porting Python language to it.

Design 8/10
Features 8/10
Sound Quality 2/10
Signal Strength 6/10
Value for money 7/10

1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. Do you?

Report
You must be a registered user to post a user review

Latest stories