Nokia Lumia 625 User Reviews
Overal user rating
The overall rating is the average of all user reviews, while the overall alternatives are the ones that has been listed most.
Everyday usage8.6/10UI speed8.6/10
Post new review
Please note that each user review reflects the opinion of its respectful author and not of Phone Arena.
posted on (Posts: 16; Member since: 14 Oct 2013)
what I've been looking for
richardraji has owned it for less than month before publishing this review
its nice large screen with the WOW factor -the very moment you set your eyes on it . its comes with a great screen and unarguably great price plus a snappy processor something you do not find on mid-range android smartphonesBuild quality 10/10Reception 10/10Call quality 9/10Internet 8/10Multimedia 10/10Camera 9/10UI speed 8/10Everyday usage 9/10Text input 10/10Display 9/10Battery 10/10
- low ram
Was this review helpful? Do you?Report
posted on 04 Jan 2014, 22:23 (Posts: 3; Member since: 04 Jan 2014)
A very decent budget 4G phone
undulose has owned it for less than month before publishing this review
This phone make me think that making a budget phone doesn't necessarily mean degrading a lot of factors on a phone. Sounds like the Moto G's tagline, right?
But I think Nokia's been thinking about that line when they produced low-end phones like the Nokia Lumia 520 and 625. And the latter really impressed me and further confirmed my thoughts on buying a flagship phone from the Lumia series.
For a price below $200, you get a phone which is excellent in performing basic phone functions, a very reliable battery, 4G connection, a somehow decent 5 MP camera, a smooth UI and efficient offline navigation provided by Nokia's HERE apps.Build quality 10/10Reception 10/10Call quality 10/10Internet 8/10Multimedia 8/10Camera 8/10UI speed 8/10Everyday usage 8/10Text input 10/10Display 8/10Battery 10/10
- 4G for a semi-mid-range device
- Very hefty battery
- Good call quality
- Very efficient phonebook
- 5 MP camera with flash and somehow decent photo-capturing
- Loud speakers
- WP is smooth and fluid
- Nokia's HERE and photography apps
- Display is enough for viewing HD videos
- Screen resolution is between low to medium-grade
- Somehow slippery for me (maybe I am more used to carrying bigger objects)
- Lacks smart dialling
- Marketplace still lacks a lot of free, top-quality apps like on Play Store
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 09 Nov 2013, 15:49 (Posts: 33; Member since: 09 Nov 2012)
Excellent mid-range phone
drdaly has owned it for less than month before publishing this review
This phone is definitely more than a Mid-range WP phone if camera was well made this phone could be among High-end ones, although screen res. is not that super but u wont feel the difference when using the phone its colorful and super sensitive really great one, so if u don't use the cam that much this absolutely will be great choiceBuild quality 9/10Reception 9/10Call quality 9/10Internet 9/10Multimedia 8/10Camera 6/10UI speed 9/10Everyday usage 9/10Text input 9/10Display 8/10Battery 10/10
- Build quality &design
- Speed UI
- LTE available
- Colourful makes me happy
- Very excellent battery life almost 2 days
- Excellent features and Nokia Apps are awesome
- Camera not satisfactory for expert users
- WP store Apps still lacks big names like instagram
10 out of 10 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 15 Oct 2013, 11:16
A very great phone.
M.Moazzam21 has owned it for less than month before publishing this review
Nice phone.Great Value for money.Windows Phone is already a very smooth and fast OS.Camera and Internet bROWSING COULD BE SLIGHTLY better.The front camera does not work well except in areas where light is strong.Overall a good phone and might be the best phone in its range.Build quality 10/10Reception 9/10Call quality 9/10Internet 9/10Multimedia 9/10Camera 9/10UI speed 9/10Everyday usage 9/10Text input 9/10Display 9/10Battery 9/10
- Huge Display.
- Cool Design.
- Great value for money.
- The phone is very well built.
- Poor front camera.
- Pixel density is a bit poor.
8 out of 8 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 15 Oct 2013, 02:25 (Posts: 0; Member since: 08 Apr 2012)
A fine phone
philip10khor has owned it for less than month before publishing this review
Great phone for the price. Windows Phone 8's interface is simply marvelous on its large screen. Performance is satisfactory. Perhaps the front camera is a bit poor, but besides that the phone is a standout.Build quality 10/10Reception 8/10Call quality 8/10Internet 9/10Multimedia 9/10Camera 8/10UI speed 9/10Everyday usage 8/10Text input 9/10Display 8/10Battery 8/10
- Great value for money
- Large screen
- Nice design
- Poor front camera
12 out of 12 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report