Nokia E90 Communicator Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Nokia E90 Communicator the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Nokia E90 Communicator compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia E90 Communicator vs Nokia N900
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches vs 0.77 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E90 Communicator-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E90 Communicator vs Apple iPhone 4S
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneNokia E90 Communicator-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Apple iPhone 4S-specific Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Thin body, measuring less than 9.5mm/0.37inches (0.37 inches)
- Dual-mode CDMA/GSM phone
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (330 ppi)
- High-resolution display (640 x 960 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Nokia E90 Communicator vs Motorola ATRIX 2
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneNokia E90 Communicator-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E90 Communicator vs Nokia N73
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches vs 0.74 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E90 Communicator-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
Nokia E90 Communicator vs Nokia 9500 Communicator
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches vs 0.95 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E90 Communicator-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E90 Communicator vs Nokia N90
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches vs 0.96 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E90 Communicator-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E90 Communicator vs Nokia E7
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz vs 680 MHz)
- Bulky
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
Nokia E90 Communicator-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E90 Communicator vs Nokia N93i
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches vs 0.98 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment





