Nokia E90 Communicator Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia E90 Communicator vs. Nokia 9500 Communicator
Nokia E90 Communicator
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia 9500 Communicator
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches vs 0.95 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia E90 Communicator vs. Nokia 9300i
Nokia E90 Communicator
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia 9300i
- No rear camera
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches vs 0.82 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia E90 Communicator vs. Nokia N900
Nokia E90 Communicator
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N900
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches vs 0.77 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E90 Communicator vs. Nokia E7
Nokia E90 Communicator
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E7
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Mini HDMI (Type C))
- Low pixel density screen (184 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- The camera lacks autofocus
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (332 MHz vs 680 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
in-depth comparison
Nokia E90 Communicator vs. Nokia 9300
Nokia E90 Communicator
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia 9300
- No rear camera
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches vs 0.82 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia E90 Communicator vs. Apple iPhone 4S
Nokia E90 Communicator
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Apple iPhone 4S
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Dual core processor
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Nokia E90 Communicator vs. Nokia Lumia 920
Nokia E90 Communicator
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia Lumia 920
- Big display (4.5 inches)
- High-resolution display (768 x 1280 pixels)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (332 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (8.7 megapixels)
- Dual core processor
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
