Nokia E75 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia E75 vs. Nokia E72
Nokia E75
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E75 vs. Nokia 5730 XpressMusic
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia E75 vs. Nokia E5
Nokia E75
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E75 vs. Nokia E55
Nokia E55
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia E75 vs. Nokia E52
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E75 vs. Nokia E71
Nokia E75
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E71
- Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.24 x 0.39 inches inches)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 169 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E75 vs. Nokia C6
Nokia E75
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia C6
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 434 MHz)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
