x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia E75 Nokia E75


  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Slow processor (369 MHz)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia E75 US Nokia E75 US


  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia E73 Mode Nokia E73 Mode


  • Small dimensions (4.48 x 2.30 x 0.40 inches inches)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia E75 US Nokia E75 US


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia E6 Nokia E6


  • High pixel densitiy screen, over 300ppi (325 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
  • Small dimensions (4.55 x 2.32 x 0.41 inches inches)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow processor (369 MHz vs 680 MHz)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E75 US Nokia E75 US


  • Slow processor (369 MHz)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)

Nokia X3 Touch and Type Nokia X3 Touch and Type


  • Small dimensions (4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia E75 US Nokia E75 US


  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia E72 Nokia E72


  • Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches inches)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia E63 Nokia E63


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • Too little RAM memory (71 MB RAM)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 169 ppi)
  • Slow processor (369 MHz)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia E75 US Nokia E75 US


  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)

Nokia N96 US Nokia N96 US


  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • Slow processor (369 MHz vs 264 MHz)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories