x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia E71x Nokia E71x


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.24 x 0.39 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 169 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia E71x Nokia E71x


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.24 x 0.39 inches vs 4.49 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia E71x Nokia E71x


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.24 x 0.39 inches vs 4.48 x 2.30 x 0.40 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia E71x Nokia E71x


  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.24 x 0.39 inches)

Samsung Galaxy Trend Lite Samsung Galaxy Trend Lite


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Nokia E71x Nokia E71x


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia E6 Nokia E6


  • High pixel density screen (325 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.24 x 0.39 inches vs 4.55 x 2.32 x 0.41 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E71x Nokia E71x


  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.24 x 0.39 inches)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia N8 Nokia N8


  • Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (Mini HDMI (Type C))

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 210 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E71x Nokia E71x


  • Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.24 x 0.39 inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia E5 Nokia E5


  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories