x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia E70 Nokia E70


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia E60 Nokia E60


  • No rear camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches vs 0.67 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (352 x 416 pixels)
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E70 Nokia E70


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia E52 Nokia E52


  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (352 x 416 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia E70 Nokia E70


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia 515 Nokia 515


  • Small dimensions (4.49 x 1.89 x 0.43 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low resolution display (352 x 416 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia E70 Nokia E70


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia E71 Nokia E71


  • Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.24 x 0.39 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (169 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (352 x 416 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia E70 Nokia E70


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia E75 Nokia E75


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (352 x 416 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia E70 Nokia E70


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (352 x 416 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs UMTS, EDGE)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches vs 0.70 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia E70 Nokia E70


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Apple iPhone Apple iPhone


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (352 x 416 pixels vs 320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories