x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia E66 Nokia E66


  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia E52 Nokia E52


  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia E66 Nokia E66


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia E72 Nokia E72


  • Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia E66 Nokia E66


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia E65 Nokia E65


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia E66 Nokia E66


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia E71 Nokia E71


  • Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.24 x 0.39 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 169 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia N95 Nokia N95


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 154 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia E66 Nokia E66


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia 6600i slide Nokia 6600i slide


  • Small dimensions (3.66 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia E66 Nokia E66


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia 6500 slide Nokia 6500 slide


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories