x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia E66 Nokia E66


  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia E52 Nokia E52


  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia E66 Nokia E66


  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM)

Nokia E75 Nokia E75


  • Full hardware keyboard for text input

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia E66 Nokia E66


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia E72 Nokia E72


  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia N95 Nokia N95


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 154 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM vs GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia E66 Nokia E66


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia E71 Nokia E71


  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.24 x 0.39 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 169 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia E66 Nokia E66


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

Nokia E51 Nokia E51


  • Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM vs 0.4375 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia E66 Nokia E66


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Sony Ericsson Hazel Sony Ericsson Hazel


  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 154 ppi)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories