Nokia E66 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia E66 vs. Nokia E52
Nokia E66
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E66 vs. Nokia E65
Nokia E65
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 220 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia E66 vs. Nokia E6
Nokia E66
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E6
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (325 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Small dimensions (4.55 x 2.32 x 0.41 inches inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 680 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
in-depth comparison
Nokia E66 vs. Nokia E73 Mode
Nokia E66
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E66 vs. Nokia N96
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 264 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia E66 vs. Nokia E71
Nokia E66
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 169 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
Nokia E66 vs. Nokia C5 5MP
Nokia E66
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia C5 5MP
- Small dimensions (4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- The camera lacks autofocus
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
