x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia E65 Nokia E65


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia X2 Nokia X2


  • Small dimensions (4.37 x 1.85 x 0.52 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia E65 Nokia E65


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia 6600 fold Nokia 6600 fold


  • Small dimensions (3.45 x 1.73 x 0.62 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (188 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia E65 Nokia E65


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia E66 Nokia E66


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia E65 Nokia E65


  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Nokia E63 Nokia E63


  • Low pixel density screen (169 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 71 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E65 Nokia E65


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia 6500 slide Nokia 6500 slide


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E65 Nokia E65


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia 6700 slide Nokia 6700 slide


  • Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E65 Nokia E65


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia E52 Nokia E52


  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories