Nokia E65 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia E65 vs. Nokia E66
Nokia E65
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (220 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia E65 vs. Nokia N95 8GB
Nokia E65
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia N95 8GB
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (220 MHz vs 332 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia E65 vs. Nokia E51
Nokia E65
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (220 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 96 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia E65 vs. Nokia 6710 Navigator
Nokia E65
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (220 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
in-depth comparison
Nokia E65 vs. Nokia X2-02
Nokia E65
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Slow processor (220 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia E65 vs. Nokia 6220 classic
Nokia E65
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia 6220 classic
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (220 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia E65 vs. Nokia E52 US
Nokia E65
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia E52 US
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (220 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
in-depth comparison
