Nokia E65 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Nokia E65 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Nokia E65 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia E65 vs Nokia N95 8GB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (220 MHz vs 332 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E65-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Nokia N95 8GB-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Nokia E65 vs Nokia 6600i slide
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E65-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (220 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Nokia 6600i slide-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.66 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E65 vs Nokia 6700 slide
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia E65-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (220 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6700 slide-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E65 vs Apple iPod touch
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Nokia E65-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (220 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Apple iPod touch-specific Pros & Cons
- Thin body, measuring less than 9.5mm/0.37inches (0.31 inches)
- Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.31 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Nokia E65 vs Nokia 6270
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E65-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (220 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Nokia 6270-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.91 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Nokia E65 vs Samsung SGH-J700
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E65-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (220 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung SGH-J700-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.91 x 1.88 x 0.58 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (102 ppi)
Nokia E65 vs Nokia E66
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (220 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E65-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Nokia E66-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E65 vs Nokia E61i
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (220 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E65-specific Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
Nokia E61i-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Bulky
- Low-resolution video capture
