Nokia E63 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia E63 vs. Nokia E71
Nokia E63
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia E71
- Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.24 x 0.39 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (169 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (71 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E63 vs. Nokia E5
Nokia E63
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (169 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (71 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Nokia E63 vs. Nokia E72
Nokia E63
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (169 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (71 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E63 vs. Nokia Asha 302
Nokia E63
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (71 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (169 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia E63 vs. Nokia E6
Nokia E63
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (169 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia E6
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (325 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Small dimensions (4.55 x 2.32 x 0.41 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 680 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (71 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
in-depth comparison
Nokia E63 vs. Nokia C3
Nokia E63
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (71 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (169 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia E63 vs. Nokia X2-01
Nokia E63
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (71 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (169 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
