Nokia E62 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia E62 vs. Nokia E61
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS)
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia E62 vs. Nokia E61i
Nokia E61i
- Slow processor (220 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs UMTS, EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia E62 vs. Nokia Asha 302
Nokia E62
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia Asha 302
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia E62 vs. Samsung Galaxy Y
Nokia E62
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung Galaxy Y
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (133 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Nokia E62 vs. Nokia E72
Nokia E62
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia E72
- Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches inches)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Nokia E62 vs. Nokia E71
Nokia E62
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia E71
- Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.24 x 0.39 inches inches)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (169 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
Nokia E62 vs. BlackBerry 8820
Nokia E62
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- No rear camera
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison

