x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia E60 Nokia E60


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)

Nokia E50 Nokia E50


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
  • Low resolution display (352 x 416 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E60 Nokia E60


  • No rear camera

Nokia E70 Nokia E70


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches vs 0.86 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (352 x 416 pixels)
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E60 Nokia E60


  • No rear camera
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Nokia E51 Nokia E51


  • Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low resolution display (352 x 416 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E60 Nokia E60


  • No rear camera
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia E52 Nokia E52


  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low resolution display (352 x 416 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E60 Nokia E60


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • No rear camera
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (352 x 416 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E60 Nokia E60


  • No rear camera
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia E72 Nokia E72


  • Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low resolution display (352 x 416 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E60 Nokia E60


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia Asha 210 Nokia Asha 210


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Low pixel density screen (169 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low resolution display (352 x 416 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories