PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Nokia E60 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia E60 Nokia E60


  • No rear camera
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Nokia E50 Nokia E50


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E60 Nokia E60


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • No rear camera
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Nokia E51 Nokia E51


  • Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches inches)
  • Slow processor (369 MHz)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E60 Nokia E60


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia N77 Nokia N77


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow processor (220 MHz)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs UMTS, EDGE)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches vs 0.74 inches inches)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E60 Nokia E60


  • No rear camera

Nokia E70 Nokia E70


  • Slow processor (220 MHz)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches vs 0.86 inches inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E60 Nokia E60


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia N95 Nokia N95


  • Slow processor (332 MHz)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches vs 0.82 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia E60 Nokia E60


  • No rear camera
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia 2700 classic Nokia 2700 classic


  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia E60 Nokia E60


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • No rear camera
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Samsung Galaxy Ace Samsung Galaxy Ace


  • Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Hot Phones

  • Samsung Galaxy S4Samsung Galaxy S4
  • Apple iPhone 5Apple iPhone 5
  • Samsung GALAXY Note IISamsung GALAXY Note II
  • HTC OneHTC One
  • Sony Xperia ZSony Xperia Z
  • Google Nexus 4Google Nexus 4
  • LG Optimus GLG Optimus G
  • Nokia Lumia 920Nokia Lumia 920