Nokia E60 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia E60 vs. Nokia E50
Nokia E60
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Nokia E50
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia E60 vs. Nokia E51
Nokia E60
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Nokia E51
- Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia E60 vs. Nokia N77
Nokia E60
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
Nokia N77
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (220 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs UMTS, EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches vs 0.74 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia E60 vs. Nokia E70
Nokia E70
- Slow processor (220 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches vs 0.86 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia E60 vs. Nokia N95
Nokia E60
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia N95
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches vs 0.82 inches inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia E60 vs. Nokia 2700 classic
Nokia E60
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia E60 vs. Samsung Galaxy Ace
Nokia E60
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison

