Nokia E5 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia E5 vs. Nokia Asha 302
Nokia Asha 302
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E5 vs. Nokia E6
Nokia E5
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Nokia E6
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (325 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Small dimensions (4.55 x 2.32 x 0.41 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz vs 680 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
in-depth comparison
Nokia E5 vs. Nokia E72
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E5 vs. Nokia Asha 303
Nokia Asha 303
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E5 vs. Nokia C3
Nokia C3
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E5 vs. Nokia E71
Nokia E71
- Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.24 x 0.39 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 169 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E5 vs. Nokia E63
Nokia E63
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 169 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 71 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
