Nokia E55 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia E55 vs. Nokia E52
Nokia E55
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches inches)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E55 vs. Nokia C5 5MP
Nokia E55
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches inches vs 4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia E55 vs. Nokia E75
Nokia E55
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia E55 vs. Nokia E72
Nokia E55
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches inches vs 4.49 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches inches)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E55 vs. Nokia E52 US
Nokia E55
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches inches)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E55 vs. Nokia E5
Nokia E55
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Nokia E55 vs. Nokia E51
Nokia E51
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches inches vs 4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Slow processor (600 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
