Nokia E52 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Nokia E52 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Nokia E52 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia E52 vs Samsung Galaxy S Plus
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneNokia E52-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E52 vs Samsung Galaxy Ace
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 165 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E52-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia E52 vs Nokia C6-01
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz vs 680 MHz)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia E52-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E52 vs Nokia C5 5MP
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches vs 4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E52-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
Nokia E52 vs Nokia E72
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches vs 4.49 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E52-specific Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia E52 vs Samsung Galaxy S II
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches vs 4.93 x 2.60 x 0.33 inches)
Nokia E52-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E52 vs Nokia E55
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E52 vs Nokia N78
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E52-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus





