Nokia E52 US Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia E52 US vs. Nokia E52
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches inches)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E52 US vs. Nokia E55
Nokia E55
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches inches)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E52 US vs. Nokia C5 5MP
Nokia E52 US
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
Nokia C5 5MP
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches inches vs 4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E52 US vs. Nokia E51
Nokia E51
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches inches vs 4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Slow processor (600 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E52 US vs. Nokia 206 Dual SIM
Nokia E52 US
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia 206 Dual SIM
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches inches vs 4.57 x 1.94 x 0.49 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
in-depth comparison
Nokia E52 US vs. Nokia Asha 311
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches inches vs 4.17 x 2.05 x 0.51 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E52 US vs. Nokia E65
Nokia E52 US
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E65
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz vs 220 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
in-depth comparison
