x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia E52 US Nokia E52 US


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

Nokia E51 Nokia E51


  • Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches vs 4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia E55 Nokia E55


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia E52 US Nokia E52 US


  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia 206 Dual SIM Nokia 206 Dual SIM


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches vs 4.57 x 1.94 x 0.49 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

in-depth comparison



Nokia E52 US Nokia E52 US


  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Nokia E72 Nokia E72


  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches vs 4.49 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia E52 US Nokia E52 US


  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)

Nokia 515 Nokia 515


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches vs 4.49 x 1.89 x 0.43 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia E52 US Nokia E52 US


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

Apple iPhone 5 Apple iPhone 5


  • High-resolution display (640 x 1136 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
  • Dual core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches vs 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories