Nokia E52 US Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Nokia E52 US the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Nokia E52 US compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia E52 US vs Nokia E51
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches vs 4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches)
- Slow processor (600 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E52 US-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
Nokia E51-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E52 US vs Nokia E55
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E52 US-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia E55-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E52 US vs Nokia E75 US
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E52 US-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia E75 US-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E52 US vs Nokia E52
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E52 US-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia E52-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia E52 US vs LG GS155A
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches vs 4.09 x 1.75 x 0.55 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 121 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 128 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia E52 US-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low-resolution video capture
LG GS155A-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E52 US vs Nokia Lumia 710
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneNokia E52 US-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia Lumia 710-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (252 ppi)
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Nokia E52 US vs Nokia N95 8GB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz vs 332 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E52 US-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia N95 8GB-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E52 US vs Samsung S3310
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches vs 4.33 x 1.81 x 0.43 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia E52 US-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung S3310-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
