x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia E51 Nokia E51


  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • No front-facing camera
  • Too little RAM memory (0.4375 GB RAM)
  • Lacks GPS

Nokia E52 Nokia E52


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches vs 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E51 Nokia E51


  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • No front-facing camera
  • Too little RAM memory (0.4375 GB RAM)
  • Lacks GPS

Nokia E52 US Nokia E52 US


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches vs 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E51 Nokia E51


  • The camera lacks flash
  • Too little RAM memory (0.4375 GB RAM)
  • Lacks GPS

Nokia E55 Nokia E55


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches vs 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • No front-facing camera
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E51 Nokia E51


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks GPS

Nokia E72 Nokia E72


  • Hardware QWERTY keyboard
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches vs 4.49 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches)
  • Too little RAM memory (0.4375 GB RAM vs 0.125 GB RAM)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E51 Nokia E51


  • Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches)
  • Too little RAM memory (0.4375 GB RAM)
  • Single-core processor

Nokia E50 Nokia E50


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Proprietary USB connector

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • No front-facing camera
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
  • Lacks GPS

in-depth comparison



Nokia E51 Nokia E51


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera
  • Too little RAM memory (0.4375 GB RAM)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Lacks GPS

Nokia 6700 classic Nokia 6700 classic


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches vs 4.32 x 1.77 x 0.43 inches)
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness

in-depth comparison



Nokia E51 Nokia E51


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks GPS

Nokia E71 Nokia E71


  • Hardware QWERTY keyboard
  • Low pixel density screen (169 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches vs 4.49 x 2.24 x 0.39 inches)
  • Too little RAM memory (0.4375 GB RAM vs 0.125 GB RAM)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories