Nokia E51 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia E51 vs. Nokia C5 5MP
Nokia E51
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches inches vs 4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia E51 vs. Nokia E52
Nokia E51
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches inches vs 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches inches)
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia E51 vs. Nokia E5
Nokia E51
- Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Nokia E51 vs. Nokia E50
Nokia E51
- Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E50
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia E51 vs. Nokia C5
Nokia E51
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches inches vs 4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia E51 vs. Nokia 5320 XpressMusic
Nokia E51
- Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches inches)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia E51 vs. Nokia E72
Nokia E51
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches inches vs 4.49 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches inches)
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison

