x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia E51 Nokia E51


  • Lots of RAM (96 GB RAM)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia E52 Nokia E52


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches vs 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia E51 Nokia E51


  • Lots of RAM (96 GB RAM)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia E55 Nokia E55


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches vs 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Nokia E51 Nokia E51


  • Lots of RAM (96 GB RAM)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia E52 US Nokia E52 US


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches vs 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia E51 Nokia E51


  • Lots of RAM (96 GB RAM)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia 6700 classic Nokia 6700 classic


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches vs 4.32 x 1.77 x 0.43 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia E51 Nokia E51


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia E72 Nokia E72


  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lots of RAM (96 GB RAM vs 128 GB RAM)
  • Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches vs 4.49 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia E51 Nokia E51


  • Lots of RAM (96 GB RAM)
  • Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia E50 Nokia E50


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Nokia E51 Nokia E51


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia E71 Nokia E71


  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • Low pixel density screen (169 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lots of RAM (96 GB RAM vs 128 GB RAM)
  • Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches vs 4.49 x 2.24 x 0.39 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories