Nokia E50 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Nokia E50 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Nokia E50 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia E50 vs Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneNokia E50-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Galaxy S II AT&T-specific Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Thin body, measuring less than 9.5mm/0.37inches (0.35 inches)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Big screen (4.30 inches)
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Nokia E50 vs Nokia E51
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E50-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Nokia E51-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E50 vs Nokia E60
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E50-specific Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia E60-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Nokia E50 vs Nokia 5500 Sport
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 208 x 208 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E50-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 5500 Sport-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (235 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
Nokia E50 vs Nokia 7210 Supernova
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E50-specific Pros & Cons
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Nokia 7210 Supernova-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 1.77 x 0.42 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E50 vs Nokia 6133
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E50-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 6133-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches)
Nokia E50 vs Nokia N96
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia E50-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Nokia N96-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (264 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia E50 vs Nokia N8
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneNokia E50-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia N8-specific Pros & Cons
- Global phone that can work on any GSM/UMTS network in the world
- High-resolution camera (12.1 megapixels)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Mini HDMI (Type C))
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Slow processor (680 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
